Standard Operating Procedure for Post-Dispatch Submission Reconciliation
| Department | Regulatory Affairs |
| SOP No. | RA/2026/703 |
| Supersedes | NA |
| Page No. | 1 of X |
| Issue Date | 13/04/2026 |
| Effective Date | 13/04/2026 |
| Review Date | 13/04/2028 |
Purpose
This SOP establishes the standardized process for post-dispatch submission reconciliation to ensure that all regulatory submissions dispatched are accurately recorded, verified, and accounted for. It supports the control objective of maintaining traceability, completeness, and compliance of regulatory submissions to meet internal quality standards and external regulatory requirements.
Scope
This procedure applies to all regulatory affairs personnel involved in preparing, reviewing, dispatching, and verifying electronic Common Technical Document (eCTD) and other regulatory submissions post-dispatch. It covers the reconciliation of submission records, dispatch logs, confirmation receipts, and related documentation for all product types and submission categories dispatched from the organization. It excludes submissions handled by external agencies beyond the initial dispatch confirmation.
Responsibilities
- Regulatory Affairs Coordinator: Execute submission record reconciliation and maintain dispatch logs.
- Quality Assurance Reviewer: Review reconciliation records and oversee compliance with the SOP.
- Regulatory Affairs Manager: Supervise the process and address discrepancies or deviations.
- Document Control: Archive reconciled submission records and related documents appropriately.
Accountability
The Regulatory Affairs Head is accountable for ensuring the implementation, adherence, periodic review, and effectiveness of this SOP. This role is responsible for escalation of unresolved discrepancies and for facilitating any corrective actions required as a result of the reconciliation process.
Procedure
1. Preparation and Prerequisites:
Ensure all dispatch records, submission packages, and confirmation receipts are available and complete. Verify that submission dates and identifiers correspond between the dispatch logs and submission master files. Confirm access to the relevant electronic submission tracking systems or databases.
2. Safety and GMP Checks:
Confirm that submissions are controlled as per documented procedures and handled with confidentiality and document integrity. Verify that all documents adhere to quality standards before the reconciliation process begins.
3. Execution Steps:
a. Retrieve Dispatch Records: Collect the dispatch logs and submission tracking sheets for the period under review.
b. Verify Submission Details: Cross-check each dispatched submission against the dispatch record to confirm submission ID, date, recipient details, and content completeness.
c. Confirm Receipt Acknowledgment: Where applicable, obtain and verify receipt acknowledgements from regulatory authorities or agencies.
d. Document Discrepancies: Record any missing, delayed, or inconsistent submission details for investigation and resolution.
4. In-Process Controls and Verification:
Conduct periodic spot checks during reconciliation to ensure accuracy. Use electronic audit trails for submission records to validate dispatch events. Confirm that all reconciled data is consistent with original submission documentation.
5. Acceptance Criteria:
All dispatched submissions must be accounted for with corresponding confirmation or receipt records. Any discrepancies must be resolved within defined timelines, with corrective actions documented and approved.
6. Handling Deviations:
Report any reconciliation discrepancies to the Regulatory Affairs Manager immediately. Initiate corrective and preventive actions (CAPA) as necessary, ensure investigation records are maintained, and update reconciliation records accordingly.
7. Approvals and Documentation:
Prepare a reconciliation summary report and submit it for review and approval by Quality Assurance. Ensure final approved records are formally archived in controlled document management systems.
8. Record Retention and Closure:
Retain all reconciliation records, summary reports, CAPA documentation, and approval evidence in accordance with regulatory and company retention policies. Confirm closure of reconciliation cycle by documented approval and notify relevant departments.
Abbreviations
- eCTD – electronic Common Technical Document
- QA – Quality Assurance
- CAPA – Corrective and Preventive Actions
- SOP – Standard Operating Procedure
Documents
- Post-Dispatch Submission Reconciliation Log (Annexure-1)
- Dispatch Confirmation Receipt Template (Annexure-2)
- Submission Discrepancy Report Form (Annexure-3)
References
- ICH M2 eCTD Specifications
- FDA Guidance for Industry: Providing Regulatory Submissions in Electronic Format – Post-Submission Issues
- Internal Document Control Policy
- Good Documentation Practices (GDP) Guidelines
- ISO 9001:2015 Quality Management Systems Requirements
Version
1.0
Approval
| Prepared By | |
| Checked By | |
| Approved By |
Annexures
Annexure-1: Post-Dispatch Submission Reconciliation Log
Purpose: To document and verify the reconciliation of dispatched regulatory submissions with records and receipts.
| Submission ID | Product/Device | Dispatch Date | Recipient Agency | Receipt Confirmation (Y/N) | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUB-2026-001 | Product A | 05/04/2026 | FDA | Y | Confirmed receipt via email |
| SUB-2026-002 | Product B | 06/04/2026 | EMA | Y | Receipt dated 07/04/2026 |
| SUB-2026-003 | Product C | 07/04/2026 | MHRA | N | Follow-up pending |
Annexure-2: Dispatch Confirmation Receipt Template
Purpose: To confirm receipt of dispatched regulatory submissions by the receiving agency.
| Submission ID: | |
| Dispatch Date: | |
| Received By: | |
| Receipt Date: | |
| Comments: | |
| Signature: | |
| Date: |
Annexure-3: Submission Discrepancy Report Form
Purpose: To record details of discrepancies found during the post-dispatch submission reconciliation process.
| Submission ID: | SUB-2026-003 |
| Date of Reconciliation: | 13/04/2026 |
| Discrepancy Description: | Receipt confirmation not received from MHRA. |
| Action Taken: | Follow-up initiated; awaiting response. |
| Reported By: | |
| Reviewed By: | |
| Approved By: | |
| Date: |
Revision History
| Revision Date | Revision No. | Revision Details | Reason for Revision | Approved By |
| 13/04/2026 | 1.0 | Initial issue | New SOP creation |